Legal Opinion

Sheffield v. Alaska Public Employees' Ass'n

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1987No. S-1238PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.

The issue presented is whether the Alaska Public Employees’ Retirement Board may compute early retirement benefits for an employee according to actuarial factors adopted subsequent to the commencement of his employment by the state and prior to his retirement, when such computation reduces the amount of early retirement benefits the employee would receive when compared to payments calculated under the actuarial factors operative at the time of commencement of his state employment. The superior court held that article XII, section 7 of the Alaska Constitution…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. City of Los Angeles Department of Water v. ManhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Arizona Governing Committee for Tax Deferred Annuity & Deferred Compensation Plans v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Betts v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Birnbaum v. New York State Teachers Retirement SystemNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
  5. Opinion of the JusticesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. McMullen v. BellAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Kahoohanohano v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Duncan v. Retired Public Employees of Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Deonier v. State, Public Employee Retirement BoardIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Alford v. State, Department of Administration, Division of Retirement & BenefitsAlaska Supreme Court · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API