Legal Opinion

McMullen v. Bell

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 2006No. S-11567PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYNER, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The Public Employees' Retirement System calculates an employee's retirement benefits based on the employee's average monthly compensation during his three best paid years. When, after thirty years working for the state, Michael McMullen retired, he sought to include substantial cashed-in leave as part of his compensation for purposes of calculating his retirement benefits. The Public Employees' Retirement Board denied McMullen's request. McMullen appeals, arguing that because the definition of "compensation" that was effective when he was hired did…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Handley v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. DeShongAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  4. DeYonge v. Nana/MarriottAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. Northwestern Construction, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ward v. State, Department of Public SafetyAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Oels v. Anchorage Police Department Employees Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Tillmon v. TillmonAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Wright v. AndingAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Kingik v. State, Department of Administration, Division of Retirement & BenefitsAlaska Supreme Court · 2010

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API