Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Savage

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1921No. 16158PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, John L. Corrigan, Judge pro tempore, entered November 7, 1919, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action in tort.

1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.

This case was before this court on a prior appeal by the plaintiff from an order of the trial court vacating a judgment entered by the clerk on the verdict of the jury, and granting a new trial. Rogers v. Savage, 112 Wash. 246, 192 Pac. 13. It was there *522held that the record failed to show any order or instruction by the court directing the clerk not to enter a judgment on the verdict; that the judgment was properly entered by the clerk on the verdict, in accordance with the mandate of the statute, Rem. Code, § 431 (P. C. §8081), and the trial court, having regularly denied the motion for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Konick v. ChampneysWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Buckley v. HarkensWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  3. De Leon v. Doyhof Fish Products Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Rogers v. SavageWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Flint v. CunySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1834

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Avery v. Associated Seed Growers, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. State ex rel. Soudas v. BrinkerWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Mountain States Implement Co. v. AraveIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Mores v. JacksonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1932
  5. Hayhurst v. HayhurstSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API