Legal Opinion

Buckley v. Harkens

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1921No. 15826PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment of tbe superior court for King county, Ronald, J., entered December 24, 1919, in favor of one of tbe defendants, notwithstanding tbe verdict of a jury for plaintiffs, in an action in tort, after a trial on tbe merits.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

— In August, 1918, tbe respondent, W. H. Harkens, while driving an automobile on a street of tbe city of Seattle, ran into an automobile owned and driven by tbe appellant Helen Buckley, causing injuries to her person and to her automobile. Later on Mrs. Buckley, her husband joining, began an action against Harkens, bis wife, and tbe respondent Gar-ford Motor Truck Company, to recover in damages for tbe injuries suffered. Tbe cause was brought to trial in June, 1919, before tbe court sitting with a jury, and on tbe tenth day of that month tbe jury returned a verdict in favor of tbe plaintiffs…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Forsyth v. DowWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Wagner v. Northern Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Anderson v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Buffalo Pitts Co. v. DearingWashington Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Stockwell v. MorrisWyoming Supreme Court · 1933
  2. May v. FarrellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. Mitchell v. ChurchesWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Nettleship v. ShipmanWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  5. George v. ChaplinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API