Rogers v. Savage
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the superior court for King county, John L. Corrigan, judge pro tempore, entered December 13, 1919, vacating a judgment and granting a new trial, after the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
This case was tried to a jury, and a verdict was returned and filed on September 18, 1919, in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $5,000. Defendants served and filed two motions, one for judgment non obstante veredicto, the other for a new trial. The motion for a new trial was made in part for “errors in law occurring’ at the trial and excepted to at the time by the defendants.” Thereafter, November 7, 1919, both motions came on for hearing, were presented to and disposed of by the court, as shown by the entry made by the clerk in the journal on that date as follows:
“Motion for new trial…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Burnham v. Spokane Mercantile Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1897
- Forsyth v. DowWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Paich v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
- Clein v. WandschneiderWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- Carkonen v. Columbia & Puget Sound RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rogers v. SavageWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- In Re Johnson's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1944
- McGirr v. FarleyWashington Supreme Court · 1944
- State v. BullockWashington Supreme Court · 1942