Legal Opinion

Konick v. Champneys

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1919No. 15337PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Hall, J., entered January 22, 1919, upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, dismissing an action for an injunction and for damages.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

To the complaint of the plaintiff in this action, the defendant interposed a demurrer on the grounds (1) that several causes of action have been improperly united, and (2) that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The demurrer was sustained by the trial court, whereupon the plaintiff elected to stand thereon and not plead further. The court then entered a judgment dismissing the action with costs, from which judgment-the plaintiff appeals.

The complaint, omitting the formal parts, is as follows:

“(1) That, at all the times hereinafter mentioned, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kitching v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  2. Gasch v. RoundsWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Stanwood v. ClanceySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1909
  4. Sweet v. IngersonNew York Supreme Court · 1856

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Potier v. A. W. Perry, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  2. City of Bremerton v. WidellWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. City of Bremerton v. WidellWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Hancammon v. . CarrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  5. Federal Waste Paper Corp. v. Garment Center Capitol, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API