Legal Opinion

De Leon v. Doyhof Fish Products Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1918No. 14934PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Hall, J., entered March 11, 1918, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action in tort.

1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.

The appellant conducts a cannery at Scow Bay, Alaska. One James H. Scott was superintendent. Respondent worked at the cannery during the season of 1917. He was under the immediate direction of a Chinese boss. It was the duty of the superintendent to look after the general conduct of the business; to have general charge over labor and of production; to maintain discipline and quell strikes or *338any uprisings that occurred at the cannery. The cannery was situate at such a distance from the home office, which is in Seattle, that it was oftentimes, if not altogether, necessary to allow Scott a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rounds v. . Del., Lack. West. R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Jones v. HogeWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Matsuda v. HammondWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. McQueen v. People's Store Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Robinson v. McNeillWashington Supreme Court · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Jerrie M. Simmons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Thompson v. Everett ClinicCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  3. Kuehn v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  4. Perry v. BeverageWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Mason v. Kenyon Zero StorageCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API