Legal Opinion
3M Co. v. Intertape Polymer Group, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided March 24, 2006No. Civ. 03-2651JRTFLNPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
TUNHEIM, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff 3M Company (“3M”) has a registered trademark on the color blue used on its painter’s tape. 3M alleges that defendants have infringed its trademarked blue color, and asserts claims for trademark infringement under 15 U.S.C. § 1114 and Minnesota common law, unfair competition under 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), dilution under 15 U.S.C. '§ 1115(c) and Minn.Stat. § 333.285, and unjust enrichment.
Defendants Intertape Polymer Group, Inc., Intertape Polymer Corp., and Central Products Company, (collectively referred to as “IPG” or…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Donna Krenik v. County of Le SueurCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Fisons Horticulture, Inc., in No. 93-7224 v. Vigoro Industries, Inc., in No. 93-7287Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Masters v. UHS of Delaware, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Fair Isaac Corp. v. Experian Information Solutions Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
- Buffalo Wild Wings International Inc. v. Grand Canyon Equity Partners, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2011
- Pinnacle Pizza Co. v. Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Pinnacle Pizza Co. v. Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.