Keisling v. Readle
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Rush Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtNew, J.
The complaint of the appellant is for a new trial on account of evidence alleged to have been discovered after the close of the term.
The original action was by the appellee against the appellant for materials claimed by the appellee to have been furnished by him and used in the construction of the appellant’s dwelling. The appellee had judgment for fifty dollars and costs.
The sustaining of a demurrer to the complaint is assigned *241as error by the appellant. This is the only question presented by the record.
In the original suit there was evidence tending to prove that the material in dispute, to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hines v. DriverIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Du Souchet v. DutcherIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Allen v. BondIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Toney v. ToneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Bowman v. ClemmerIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Donahue v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Ross v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
- Kelley v. KelleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
- Anderson v. HathawayIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- East v. McKeeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.