Legal Opinion

Ross v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1914PublishedCited by 30 opinions

PROM GREENE. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Grreene County.— Dana Harmon, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Me. Chief J ixstioe Neil

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Plaintiff in error was indicted in the circuit court of Grreene county for having unlawful carnal knowledge of one MacMe Burnett, a girl under the age of consent. He was convicted, and sentenced to a term of four years in the state penitentiary. Prom this judgment he has appealed and assigned three errors: First, that the trial judge erred in refusing to continue the cause on an affidavit filed; secondly, because he refused to grant a new trial for newly discovered evidence; *390thirdly, that the evidence preponderates against the verdict.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. AbbottMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Hamm v. RomineIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Jamison v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Branch v. KlattMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Keisling v. ReadleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Teague v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
  2. Bass v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Hargrove v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Taylor v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Schweizer v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1966

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API