Legal Opinion

Kelley v. Kelley

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 12, 1893No. 927PublishedCited by 23 opinions

From the Harrison Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtReinhard, J.

One of the errors relied upon is the sustaining of a demurrer to the appellant’s second paragraph of answer. It is conceded that the facts pleaded in this paragraph were admissible under the general denial, which was also pleaded. The error, if any, was therefore harmless. Elliott’s App. Proced., section 637, and cases cited.

Another alleged error is the overruling of the joint motion of appellant and his co-defendant for a new trial. The appellant was sued jointly by the appellee with another for damages for an alleged assault and battery. The defendants answered separately the general…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lake Erie & Western Railway Co. v. AcresIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Scheible v. SlagleIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. HendricksIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Allen v. BondIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. PedigoIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. PhippsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Edmonds v. MounseyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Ellis v. City of HammondIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Perry v. Acme Oil Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1909
  5. Burrus v. Nevada-California-Oregon RailwayNevada Supreme Court · 1914

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API