Legal Opinion

United States v. Scarmazzo

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 1, 2008No. 2:06-cr-00342PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER RE GOVERNMENT’S MOTIONS IN LIMINE

OLIVER W. WANGER, District Judge.

The following orders on motions in li-mine and for clarification of and addressing supplemental motions in limine have been heard and decided by United States District Court Judges Lawrence J. O’Neill and Oliver W. Wanger. The following rulings are set forth for the benefit of and as guidance to the parties.

I.Motion Number 1: Exclude Evidence and Questioning Suggesting Defense of Medical Necessity.

Defendants are ordered not to introduce any evidence, questioning, or testimony, either expert or lay…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. United States v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Ratzlaf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Cheek v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Gonzales v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. United States v. FeolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. HicksDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010
  2. United States v. HarveyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2011
  3. United States v. StacyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2010
  4. People v. ReddenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. United States v. DuvalDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API