Legal Opinion · Concurrence

People v. Redden

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 14, 2010No. Docket Nos. 295809 and 295810Published

1ConcurrenceO’Connell, P.J.

I concur with the majority’s decision to affirm the circuit court’s decision to reinstate the charges against defendants, but write separately because I interpret the statutory defenses at issue more narrowly than does the majority, and also to elaborate on issues raised in the briefs and at oral argument but not fully addressed by the majority opinion.

*91On November 4, 2008, the Michigan Medical Marihuana Act (MMMA), MCL 333.26421 et seq., was passed by initiative and went into effect soon thereafter. It is without question that this act has no effect on federal prohibitions of the possession…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gonzales v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. People v. WolfeMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  3. United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers' CooperativeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. People v. BrownMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. People v. MeshellMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API