Ross v. Smiley
Colorado Court of Appeals
Error to the District Court of Arapahoe County.
1Opinion of the CourtGunter, J.
This was an action hy a real estate agent to recover commissions. At the close of plaintiff’s case the court ruled, “I will grant the motion for a non-suit on the ground of failure to show an acceptance of the offer hy the purchaser, * * To review the ruling is this proceeding. The facts were: Defendant owned the Smiley Block in the city of Denver, upon which was an encumbrance in the principal sum of $30,000.00. Charles W. Pulton, residing in Scranton, Pennsylvania, knew the property, of the encumbrance thereon, and that plaintiff was defendant’s agent for its sale. Pulton owned real estate…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wm. Skinner & Sons' Ship-Building & Dry-Dock Co. v. HoughtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1900
- Finnerty v. FritzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1879
- Buckingham v. HarrisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
- Godding v. DeckerColorado Court of Appeals · 1893
- Taylor v. WilliamsColorado Court of Appeals · 1892
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ellis Canning Company v. BernsteinDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1972
- Dean v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- W. T. Craft Realty Co. v. LivernashColorado Court of Appeals · 1914
- Talcott v. MastinColorado Court of Appeals · 1905
- King Powder Co. v. DillonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.