Legal Opinion

King Powder Co. v. Dillon

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1908No. 5340; No. 2986 C. APublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the City and County of Denver. Hon. E. E. Armour, Judge. Action by Thomas P. Dillon, Jr., against The King Powder Company. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Maxwell

This is an action to recover commissions plaintiff claims are due him, under a written contract which he made with the defendant company.

Prom a judgment in his favor is this appeal.

The action was commenced by filing a complaint November 13, 1900, which was in one count based upon an alleged exclusive agency for the sale of defendants powder in the state of Colorado.

June 15, 1903, two days before the commencement of the trial, by leave of court, plaintiff filed an amended complaint which was in two counts; the first based upon an alleged exclusive agency, as in the original complaint, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Babcock v. MerrittColorado Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Colburn v. SeymourSupreme Court of Colorado · 1904
  3. Ross v. SmileyColorado Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. Fox v. Denargo Land Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1906
  5. Cole v. ThornburgColorado Court of Appeals · 1893

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Perkins v. RussellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1913
  2. Navy Gas & Supply Co. v. SchoechSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940
  3. Rudd-Melikian, Inc. v. Henry T. Merritt, Doing Business as Coffee Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
  4. Rudd-Melikian, Inc. v. Henry T. Merritt, Doing Business as Coffee Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
  5. Weitbrec v. MorrisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API