Legal Opinion

Stetson v. Orland Oil Syndicate, Ltd.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 28, 1940No. Civ. 6458PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, J., pro tern.

This was an action wherein plaintiffs sought a decree quieting their title in and to certain lands in Tehama County.

The defendants admit title in the plaintiffs to the lands in controversy but claim a leasehold interest therein by virtue of a certain oil and gas lease entered into between the parties.

The trial court found that the lease was terminated prior to the commencement of the action and entered its decree quieting the title in the plaintiffs and further decreeing that the defendants have no interest in or to the property. Prom this decree defendants prosecute the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hanes v. CoffeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. J. J. Fagan & Co. v. BurnsMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Caswell v. GardnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. C. M. Staub Shoe Co. v. ByrneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Calhoma Oil Corp. v. ConniffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Loving & Evans v. BlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Trubowitch v. Riverbank Canning Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Butler v. NeppleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Johnson v. AtkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Silva v. MercierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API