Legal Opinion

Calhoma Oil Corp. v. Conniff

California Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1929No. Docket No. S.F. 13053PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

The plaintiff corporation instituted this action to permanently enjoin and restrain the defendants from interfering with its asserted endeavor to continue drilling operations on a tract of land situate in Alameda County, which tract by written lease bearing date March 19, 1925, had been demised to it for a term of five years by the defendants. The lessors, by way of affirmative defense, alleged in their answer that the lessee had violated a provision of the lease requiring continuous drilling, which violation, it was alleged, caused the lessors, on September 29, 1926, to serve the lessee with…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Williams v. EdgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hanes v. CoffeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Stetson v. Orland Oil Syndicate, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. Cavanaugh v. HighCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Montana Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Shell Oil Co.District Court, D. Montana · 1963
  5. Reserve Oil & Gas Co. v. MetzenbaumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API