Jantzon v. Arizona Copper Co.
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the First Judicial District in and for the County of Graham. ¡William H. Barnes, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtPorter, J.
This was an action in ejectment. Cause was tried by the court, and judgment rendered for the plaintiff. The title of plaintiff was asserted title to a mining claim called the “West Extension of the Thompson,” derived by a chain of title to the location of Freudenthal, in January, 1882. It assigned for error that plaintiff failed to show that that location was valid under the mining laws, by proof that Freudenthal is a citizen of the United States; that the notice of location was posted on the claim; that he erected monuments marking the same on the ground.
The location notice was offered in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Richardson v. McNultyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Golden Fleece G. & S. M. Co. v. Cable Consolidated G. & S. M. Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1877
- Lebanon Mining Co. v. Consolidated Republican Mining Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1882
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wilson v. Triumph Consolidated Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1899
- Dean v. Omaha-Wyoming Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1913
- Bowen v. Sil-Flo CorporationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Wallerstedt v. TrankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Atchley v. VarnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929