Lebanon Mining Co. v. Consolidated Republican Mining Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Appeal from District Court of Clear Creek County. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Beck, O. J.
The appellee in this case having made application in the United States land office in Central City to enter the Peru Lode mining claim, the appellant filed an adverse claim to a portion of the premises embraced in the application for patent, claiming the same as parcel of its Lebanon Tunnel Lode No. 3, and brought this suit in support of the adverse claim.
The plaintiff below brings the case here for review, assigning numerous errors, the more serious of which relate *373to the action of the district court in rejecting evidence offered by the plaintiff to prove its title to the premises…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Harris v. Equator Mining & Smelting Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado · 1881
- Phillpotts v. BlasdelNevada Supreme Court · 1872
- Faxon v. BarnardU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado · 1880
- Holland v. Mount Auburn Gold Quartz Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1878
- Gelcich v. MoriartyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
3Cited by28 opinions
- Omar v. SoperSupreme Court of Colorado · 1888
- Hinojos v. LohmannColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- Kirk v. MeldrumSupreme Court of Colorado · 1901
- Jantzon v. Arizona Copper Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1889
- Schwarz v. UlmerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.