Hayes v. Ducasse
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles. Waldo M. York, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, C.
This case concerns the title to a lot of land in the city of Los Angeles. Plaintiff claims through one Campbell who was the purchaser of such land at a sale thereof made on July 14, 1894, for delinquent state and county taxes of the fiscal year 1893-94. At the trial the defendants offered no evidence, but relied on various objections to the sufficiency of the deed to Campbell executed by the tax collector on May 14, 1896, pursuant to said sale. Plaintiff had judgment, and the only question on appeal is whether the tax deed is void on its face.
It is stated in said deed among other…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- French v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Rollins v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Ferris v. CooverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- O'Grady v. BarnhiselCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- Wetherbee v. DunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hall v. ChamberlainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Horsky v. McKennanMontana Supreme Court · 1916
- Smart v. PeekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Sakraida v. SakraidaOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- Joslin v. ShafferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.