Legal Opinion

Rothchild Bros. v. Rollinger

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1903No. 4628PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Kittitas County. — Hon. Prank H. Rudkin, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Tlie opinion of tfie court was delivered by

Mount, J.

Action to remove cloud, quiet title, and obtain possession of certain real estate in Kittitas county. A decree was entered in favor of the defendants by the court below. Plaintiff appeals. The facts are as follows: Prior to the year 1900 the appellant was the owner of the land in question. This land is located in what is known as the “Middle Kittitas Irrigation District,” organized under the act of March 20, 1890. In the year 1899, upon the neglect and refusal of the board of directors and other officers of the said Middle Kittitas…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. In re Organization & of the Bonds of the Central Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Packwood v. BriggsWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Board of Directors v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Directors of Fallbrook Irrigation District v. AbilaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hollywood, Inc. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
  2. City of Spokane v. Security Savings SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Olson v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. J. K. Lumber Co. v. AshWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Hemen v. RinehartWashington Supreme Court · 1906

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API