Legal Opinion

Bernard v. Kuhn

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 12, 1985No. 393, September Term, 1985PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES S. GETTY, Judge,

Specially Assigned.

The Maryland Uniform Arbitration Act, Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article, Section 3-223(b)(2), authorizes a cause of action for modification or correction of an award where the Arbitrator has decided an issue not submitted to him, providing that the modification or correction does not affect the merits of the decision upon the issues submitted. The central issue in this case, therefore, is whether the costs of the arbitration, including all attorney’s fees and other expenses incurred, were submitted to the Arbitrator as an issue to be decided by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Agnew v. Lacey Co-PlyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  2. Shapiro v. GordonNew York Supreme Court · 1949
  3. In re the Arbitration between Messina & Briante Inc. & Blitman Construction Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Casias v. Dairyland InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Marsh v. Loffler Housing Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  3. Hospital Employees, Local 1273 v. Deaton Hospital & Medical Center of Christ Lutheran ChurchDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1986
  4. Comprehensive Orthopaedics & Musculoskeletal Care, LLC v. AxtmayerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  5. Comprehensive Orthopaedics & Musculoskeletal Care, LLC v. AxtmayerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API