Legal Opinion

Agnew v. Lacey Co-Ply

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 29, 1982No. 9277-4-IPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

S. J. Agnew, d/b/a Agnew Environmental Products, appeals from an order of the Superior Court confirming an arbitration award and denying Agnew's motions to partially vacate or to modify the award with regard to attorney's fees. The underlying contract in the dispute provided that the prevailing party in arbitration "shall be entitled" to reasonable attorney's fees. Although Agnew was successful in the arbitration, the arbitrators did not award attorney's fees.

The dispute arose over an industrial wood waste fired furnace which Agnew agreed to sell to respondent Lacey Co-Ply, a cooperative…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Wagner v. WagnerWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Farmers Insurance v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Anderson v. Gold Seal Vineyards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Spokane County Ex Rel. Sullivan v. GloverWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Northern State Construction Co. v. BancheroWashington Supreme Court · 1963

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Barnett v. HicksWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Boyd v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Phillips Building Co., Inc. v. AnCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  4. Marine Enterprises, Inc. v. Security Pacific Trading Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  5. Lindon Commodities, Inc. v. Bambino Bean Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1990

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API