Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Messina & Briante Inc. & Blitman Construction Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 31, 1961PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJames D. Hopkins, J.
An arbitration award has been made. The petitioner moves to confirm the award; the respondent *22cross-moves to set aside the award. The questions presented arise from the grounds asserted in support of the cross motion.
1. The respondent urges that the majority arbitrators exceeded their power under the arbitration clause of the contract. The respondent was engaged as general contractor in the construction of a moderate rental housing project in Stamford, Connecticut. The petitioner was the subcontractor for the excavation, filling and grading work called for under the general contract. The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Matter of Lipman (Haeuser Shellac Co.)New York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Fudickar v. . Guardian Mutual Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Matter of WilkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- In re the Arbitration between Staklinski & Pyramid Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
- Matter of Stange v. Thompson-Starrett Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Azcon Construction Co. v. Golden Hills Resort, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Jaffe v. NoceraDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Marsh v. Loffler Housing Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Bernard v. KuhnCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985