Comprehensive Orthopaedics & Musculoskeletal Care, LLC v. Axtmayer
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Dissent
KATZ, J., with whom ROGERS, C. J., and PALMER, J.,
join, dissenting. The majority concludes that the arbitrator’s decision refusing to award attorney’s fees to the named plaintiff, Comprehensive Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal Care, LLC,1 is unreviewable because, *763as long as the arbitrator rendered one of two possible awards—either awarding attorney’s fees or not awarding attorney’s fees—the award conformed to the submission. The majority reasons that the arbitrator implicitly decided that the named plaintiff had not prevailed, despite being awarded $75,000 in damages on the claim at issue,…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Berry v. LoiseauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Harty v. Cantor Fitzgerald and Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Board of Education v. AFSCME, Council 4, Local 287Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Russell v. RussellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.