Legal Opinion

E. W. Bliss Co. v. Atlantic Handle Co.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided March 19, 1913No. 348PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Equity. Suit by the E. W. Bliss Company against the Atlantic Handle Company.' Petition for attachment for contempt against George E. Vaughan.

1Opinion of the Court

MORTON, District Judge.

This is a petition for attachment for contempt against George E. Vaughan. On December 6, 1912, a final decree for the complainant was entered in the principal case, and on December 7th a permanent injunction issued forbidding the “Atlantic Handle Company, its servants and agents,” from making, using, or selling the device described in the patent in suit. The petition alleges that Vaughan is in contempt for violating this injunction.

The material facts are as follows: Vaughan was not a party to the suit, which was against the Atlantic Handle Company, a Massachusetts…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re LennonSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Campbell v. Magnet Light Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1909
  3. Donaldson v. Roksament Stone Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · 1910
  4. Omeliah v. American Cap Front Mfg. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1912
  5. Bernard v. FrankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Alemite Mfg. Corporation v. StaffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  2. Chase National Bank v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Harvey v. BettisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
  4. Hoover Co. v. Exchange Vacuum Cleaner Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1932
  5. A. S. Boyle Co. v. Siegel Hardware & Paint Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API