Legal Opinion

Donaldson v. Roksament Stone Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York

Decided March 8, 1910PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Equity. Suit by John Donaldson against the Roksament Stone Company. On motion to punish Richard Herbst for contempt.

1Opinion of the Court

CHATEIEED, District Judge.

The present motion presents an unusual situation. The complainant has prevailed in an action against the defendant for infringement of patent. He has also obtained a decree (see 176 Fed. 368) adjudging the former president of the defendant corporation in contempt for continuing acts which this court had held were (under the terms of its decision) a willful further infringement. The complainant has now asked for an order holding one Richard Herbst in contempt, under the following circumstances:

During the year 1907, Herbst was a salesman of the defendant company. He…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Donaldson v. Roksament Stone Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · 1910

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Alemite Mfg. Corporation v. StaffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  2. Chase National Bank v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Harvey v. BettisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
  4. E. W. Bliss Co. v. Atlantic Handle Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1913
  5. Hoover Co. v. Exchange Vacuum Cleaner Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API