Legal Opinion
Harvey v. Bettis
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 28, 1929No. 5883PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIETRICH, Circuit Judge.
In a patent infringement case entitled William I. Bettis and Others v. Eno Rubber Corporation and Others, the court below issued a preliminary injunction on July 3, 1928, restraining the defendants and their “officers, directors, at torneys, agents, salesmen, servants, workmen, employees, assistants, associates, and representatives” from manufacturing, using, or selling the patented device referred to in the complaint. Thereafter, on January 9, 1929, after a hearing upon citation, the court entered an order fining the appellant, E. J. Harvey, for contempt for the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mexican Ore Co. v. Mexican Guadalupe Mining Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1891
- Donaldson v. Roksament Stone Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · 1910
- Campbell v. Magnet Light Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1909
- Donaldson v. Roksament Stone Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · 1910
- E. W. Bliss Co. v. Atlantic Handle Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Alemite Mfg. Corporation v. StaffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Parker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1942
- Cassidy v. Puett Electrical Starting Gate Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
- United States v. Dean Rubber Mfg. Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1946
- Hoover Co. v. Exchange Vacuum Cleaner Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.