Legal Opinion

A. S. Boyle Co. v. Siegel Hardware & Paint Co.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided December 15, 1938No. 4447PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FORD, District Judge.

The instant case is a suit which charges infringement of claims 5, 6, 7, 14, 17, and 18 of a patent issued to one Griffiths No. 1,838,618. The patent was issued December 29, 1931, as the result of an application filed November 17, 1923.

The plaintiff is The A. S. Boyle Company, the present owner of the patent. The defendant named in the suit is the Siegel Hardware and Paint Compány (hereinafter referred to as the Siegel Company). It is a Massachusetts corporation located at Boston, and it is charged with infringement of the patent in suit by selling an artificial wood…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. O'Reilly v. MorseSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  3. Bigelow v. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Carnegie Steel Co. v. Cambria Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  5. Altoona Publix Theatres, Inc. v. American Tri-Ergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commercial Union Insurance Company v. Eugene Westrope, John Jetter, Loretta Jetter, and Joe Alday, Nathan Overstreet, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  2. The UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUND. v. Block Drug Co.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 1955
  3. La Maur, Inc. v. L. S. Donaldson Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1961
  4. Arco Polymers, Inc. v. STUDIENGESELLSCHAFT KOHLEDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API