Legal Opinion

John Howard Wrighten v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided March 7, 1977No. 76-2112PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner, John Howard Wrighten, was disbarred by the South Carolina Supreme Court from the practice of law in that state. He was charged with withholding, failing to account for and misappropriating funds belonging to clients. The South Carolina Supreme Court’s order of disbarment was entered upon recommendation of the State Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline. In re Wrighten, 257 S.C. 184, 184 S.E.2d 717 (1971).

On April 21,1975, Wrighten was suspended from practice before the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina. The suspension order provided that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Theard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Selling v. RadfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. In the Matter of the Petition of SellingSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. In re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re HendersonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2006
  2. Committee on Legal Ethics of the West Virginia State Bar v. BattistelliWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. In Re William B. Dawson, Iii, an AttorneyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  4. In the Matter of Glen Marcus FallinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
  5. In Re Sanchez-FerreriDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API