Legal Opinion
City of West Allis v. Rainey
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided October 31, 1967PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.
The single and narrow issue raised by this appeal is whether or not the trial court committed prejudicial error when it permitted Officer Marlewski to testify that the breathalyzer reading was .19 of one percent blood alcohol by weight.
No objection was made in the trial court, or has been raised on this appeal, challenging the reliability or accuracy of this breathalyzer machine, or the qualifications of this officer to give the test, or the manner in which this test was given. The sole objection is that the trial court permitted Marlewski to give the results of his reading (without first…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Toms v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
- Kuroske v. Ætna Life Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
- Alexander v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1956
- State v. ReslerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Omohundro v. County of ArlingtonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- National Amusement Co. v. Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Stafford Trucking, Inc. v. State, Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
- City of Milwaukee v. LindnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Prechel v. City of MonroeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. BondsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.