Alexander v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
POWELL, Judge.
Plaintiff in error, Sarah E. Alexander, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was tried before a jury in the municipal criminal court of Tulsa of the crime of driving a motor vehicle upon a public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, was found guilty, but the jury being unable to agree upon the penalty left that to the court, who fixed punishment at imprisonment in the Tulsa County jail for ten days, and a fine of $100. Appeal has been duly perfected to this court.
For reversal it is urged, among other things, that “The court erred in admitting in evidence…
2Cases cited86 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Holt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Twining v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Adamson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. HenningTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. BockIdaho Supreme Court · 1958
- Tarter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1961
- People v. DonaldsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
- People v. ConternoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.