Legal Opinion

Omohundro v. County of Arlington

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided April 20, 1953No. Record 4062PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtSpratley, J.

Plaintiff in error, Eoland C. Omohundro, stands convicted of operating a motor vehicle over the highways of Arlington County, Virginia, while under the influence of alcoholic beverages, in violation of an ordinance of that county. He was tried by a jury which fixed his punishment at a fine of $100.00. The trial court overruled a motion “to set aside the verdict of the jury as being contrary to the law and the evidence,” and entered judgment and sentence accordingly. We granted writ of error.

The evidence in the case was not recorded at the time of trial. It is presented to us in narrative form…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Toms v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
  2. First National Bank v. William R. Trigg Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1907
  3. People v. BobczykAppellate Court of Illinois · 1951
  4. People v. MorseMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Lane Bros. & Co. v. BausermanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1904

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pruitt v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Fortune v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
  3. People v. KovacikNew York Court of Special Session · 1954
  4. City of West Allis v. RaineyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Prince Seating Corp. v. RabideauSupreme Court of Virginia · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API