Legal Opinion

Prechel v. City of Monroe

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1968No. 92PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

The appellants take the position that the legislative intent to permit a mandatory referendum is clear from the face of the statute. Admittedly, action of the Monroe city council was pursuant to sec. 66.48, Stats., the “Blighted Area Law.” Sec. 66.43 (17) is the last subsection of that act. It provides:

“Liquidation And Disposal. Projects held under this section may be liquidated and disposed of under s. 66.40 (25).”

Sec. 66.40 (25), Stats., is captioned, “Liquidation And Disposal Of Housing Projects,” and provides, in part:

“(a) In any city or village the city council or village board by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Valley Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  2. West Side Bank v. Marine National Exchange BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Landt v. City of Wisconsin DellsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. City of West Allis v. RaineyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State v. Columbian National Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Omernik v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Donaldson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. In Matter of Estate of WalkerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Candee v. EganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Hoeft v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API