Legal Opinion

Parker v. State ex rel. Sebring

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 28, 1964No. 40485PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Justice:

The plaintiffs in error, hereafter referred to as plaintiffs, claim to have been general depositors in the defunct Bank of Earlsboro, now in the hands of the defendant in error, State Bank Commissioner, for liquidation. During the proces of liquidation they filed their respective claims against the defunct bank as provided by statute. These claims were rejected, and all plaintiffs appealed to the district court as provided by 6 O.S. 1961 § 162Z. For the purposes of the district court trial, all claims were consolidated. A jury trial was demanded by plaintiffs and refused by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hurley v. HurleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Dowdy v. ClausewitzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  4. Russell v. FreemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  5. Steinway v. Griffith Consolidated Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Waggoner v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  2. Butcher v. McGinnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  3. Butcher v. McGinnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API