Legal Opinion

Donahoe v. Franks

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 14, 1912No. 625PublishedCited by 10 opinions

In Fquity. Suit by j ohn Donahoe and another against Byron Franks for specific performance. On final hearing. Decree for complainants.

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON, District Judge.

A bill was filed by the plaintiffs for specific performance by the defendant of a contract for the purchase of certain lands at Trenton, N. J. The suit was based upon an agreement in writing as follows:

“Articles of agreement, made and entered into the first day of Juno, A. D„ nineteen hundred and ten, between John Donahoe (and Mary Donahoe, his wife) and Thomas Nolan, (and Raura Nolan, his wife) of the city of Trenton, in the county of Mercer and state of New Jersey, parties of the first part and Byron Franks, of the same place, party of the second part, witnesseth:
“Th…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cathcart v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  2. Cheney v. LibbySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. KeelingTexas Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Moss & Raley v. WrenTexas Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Brown v. NorcrossNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1900

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Roth v. HartlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. Asia Investment Co. v. LevinWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Continental Oil Co. v. MulichCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  4. Dillon v. RinglemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. La Prelle v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API