Legal Opinion

Brown v. Norcross

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 6, 1900PublishedCited by 16 opinions

On bill for specific performance, answer and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

Grey, V. C.

The complainant is a widow, and files this bill to compel specific performance of an agreement made between herself and her husband (who was then living), on the one part, and the defendant, on the other part, to the effect that they should convey to the defendant a piece of land in Mount Holly, the property of the complainant. By the agreement, which is in writing, the party of the first part agrees to sell, and the party of the second part to purchase, the lot of land

*428“ for the price of $400, of which $25 is now paid and receipt hereby acknowledged, the balance, $375, to be paid…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hull v. SturdivantSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1858
  2. McTague v. Sea Isle City Lot & Building Ass'n No. 3Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1894

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Kettering v. EastlackSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  2. State v. Bakers Basin Realty Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  3. Armstrong v. StifflerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  4. Volk v. Atlantic Acceptance Realty Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948
  5. Centex Homes Corp. v. BoagNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API