Legal Opinion
Continental Oil Co. v. Mulich
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 11, 1934No. 979PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal by the Continental Oil Company from a decree for reformation and specific performance of an option contract.
The cause was referred to the Honorable Clifford Histed as special master. He filed a report evidencing thoroughness and ability, which was approved and confirmed in all matters by the trial court.
The material facts are not in dispute and are these: In the latter part of 1929 the Continental Company requested the J. C. Nichols Real Estate Company to submit tracts of land in Kansas City, Kansas, suitable for filling station sites. In December,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Columbian Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. BlackCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1929
- Jackson v. JarrattTennessee Supreme Court · 1932
- Guild v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896
- Niquette v. GreenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
- Russell v. Shell Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. Richard B. HuntCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. DismangCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- Gates v. GatesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
- Hamilton v. BingerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
- Humphrey v. Bankers Mortg. Co. of Topeka, Kan.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.