Legal Opinion
Dillon v. Ringleman
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 8, 1916No. 6160PublishedCited by 9 opinions
Error from District Court, Blaine County; James R. Tolbert, Judge. Action by Susie R. Ringleman against John H..Dillon. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
MATHEWS, C.
The parties will be designated as in the trial court. This is an action for specific performance instituted by a vendor against the vendee.
As a preliminary to this action, the parties hereto executed the following contract: '
“This contract., made and entered into this 1st day of February, 1911, by and between Susie R. Ringleman, party of the first part, and John H. Dillon, party of the second part, witnesseth, that the said party of the first part has this day sold to the said party of the second, part the following described real estate, to wit: The east one-half of the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Cathcart v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
- Koch v. StreuterIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
- Hogan v. KyleWashington Supreme Court · 1894
- Migatz v. StieglitzIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
- Johnston v. WadsworthOregon Supreme Court · 1893
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dillard v. CeaserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Higgins-Jones Realty Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Harrell v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Kansas Flour Mills Co. v. BallardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Strain v. StatlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.