Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania Electric Co. v. Shannon

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 24, 1954No. Appeal, No. 297PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Per Curiam,

All of the issues litigated below in this proceeding were fully and correctly disposed of in the opinion of Judge Walter I. Anderson of the 19th Judicial District, specially presiding. A question concerning alleged rights in Spencer S. Shannon nnder a coal lease from Midlothian Coal Company, assigned to William Seed, which the appellants belatedly sought to raise on this appeal, was neither presented to nor passed upon by the learned court below. It cannot, therefore, be injected here: Muse-Art Corporation v. Phila*354delphia, 373 Pa. 329, 332-333, 95 A. 2d 542, and Bourd v.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Smith v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  2. Montgomery County Bar Ass'n v. RinalducciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Hamberg v. BarskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  4. Philadelphia Housing Authority v. Turner Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Muse-Art Corp. v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Consolidation Coal Co. v. WhiteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Autoridad Sobre Hogares v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961
  3. City of Lebanon v. District Council 89Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Gilbert v. FeldDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. LLOYD ENTER., INC. v. Dept. of RevenueDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API