Legal Opinion
Gilbert v. Feld
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 14, 1993No. Civ. 91-3804PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LOUIS H. POLLAK, District Judge.
This case arises out of plaintiff Gary Gilbert’s sale of a parcel of land located in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania. Because the defendant purchasers and their attorneys believed that Gilbert had committed criminal fraud in connection with that sale, criminal charges were brought against Gilbert. Those charges were subsequently dismissed. In the instant civil action, Gilbert alleges that various defendants are liable for: (1) malicious prosecution; (2) abuse of the criminal process; (3) false arrest and imprisonment; (4) intentional infliction of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Griffiths v. Cigna Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Lawrence B. Thomas, and Cross-Appellant v. E. J. Korvette, Inc., and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Kelley v. General Teamsters, Chauffeurs, & Helpers, Local Union 249Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Glass v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
- Bristow v. ClevengerDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- Luck v. Mount Airy 1, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Floyd v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- Dintino v. EcholsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.