Legal Opinion

Mayor of Nashville v. Singer & Johnson Fertilizer Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1912PublishedCited by 13 opinions

FROM DAVIDSON. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Davidson County. — John Aijjson, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Buchanan

This is a suit for damages based on an alleged breach of contract, and seeks to fasten liability upon the Singer & Johnson Fertilizer Company as principal, and upon the other defendant as surety. Each of defendants demurred to the bill. The chancellor sustained the demurrers, and dismissed the bill at complainant’s cost; and it has appealed and assigned errors.

By the contract sued on, the principal became bound co remove dead horses, and other animals therein enumerated, from the streets and alleys of the city of Nashville within a time certain after notice; and, being so bound and after…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Deming & Co. v. Merchants' Cotton-press, etc., Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1891
  2. McHarge v. M. M. Newcomer & Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Chattanooga Light & Power Co. v. HodgesTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Anderson v. MillerTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  5. American Lead Pencil Co. v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis RailwayTennessee Supreme Court · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. v. Dingle-Clark Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Southall v. BillingsTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Thayer v. Wright CompanyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1961
  4. In Re the Estate of DarwinTennessee Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Yarbrough v. L. N.R.R. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1930

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API