Legal Opinion

McHarge v. M. M. Newcomer & Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1906PublishedCited by 52 opinions

FROM KNOX Appeal in error from the Circuit Court of Knox County. — Joseph W. Sneed, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shields

This action is brought by the plaintiffs to recover damages for persona] injuries sustained by Mrs. Mc-Harge by reason of the falling of an awning roller from the front of a building, in the possession of and occupied by the defendants, M. M. Newcomer & Co., as a store, on Gay street, in the city of Knoxville.

The plaintiffs allege in their declaration that the defendants were engaged in operating a dry goods store, occupying for that purpose a building on Gay street, in the city of Knoxville, and that while Mrs. McHarge was lawfully upon said street, in front of and near the said building,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Robbins v. Chicago CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Chicago City v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
  3. Mullen v. . St. JohnNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  4. Powell v. Construction Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Callanan v. . GilmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1887

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Federal Insurance Company a/s/o Robert and Joanie Emerson v. Martin Edward Winters, d/b/a Winters Roofing CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 2011
  2. International Harvester Co. v. SartainCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948
  3. Greg Parker v. Holiday Hospitality Franchising, IncorporatedTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
  4. North Memphis Sav. Bank v. Union Bridge & Construction Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Sullivan v. CrabtreeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1953

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API