Legal Opinion
Moon Motor Car Co. v. State Ex Rel. Shull
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 2, 1931No. 19876PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSwindall, J.
It appears that certain automobiles were sold to David Allison, doing business as Oklahoma Moon Company, by the Moon Motor Oar Company, under its finance plan No. 2, which was as follows:
“By this plan the dealer pays his banker in cash ten per cent, of the wholesale price, which includes war tax. The banker in turn remits to us the ten per cent, in cash, and the bank’s three months’ certificate of deposit for 90 per cent, of the invoice price.
“We agree to renew this certificate of deposit at the expiration of 90 days for an additional 60 days on such cars that have not been sold and remain…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- State v. McFetridgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
- Estate of LawPennsylvania Orphans' Court, Philadelphia County · 1891
- Livingstain v. Columbian Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
- Henry Miller, in Error v. David Austen, William S. Wilmerding, and David Austen, Jr.Supreme Court of the United States · 1852
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Durant v. SnyderIdaho Supreme Court · 1944
- Crume v. RiversSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Valley National Bank v. First National BankArizona Supreme Court · 1958
- In Re Farmers State Bank of GarberSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Vogel v. City of VinitaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.