Legal Opinion

Kerr, Administrator v. Greenstein

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 3, 1948No. 4-8531PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McFaddin, Justice.

Tlie sufficiency of the service of process on the appellee is the issue for decision. The question is: does service pursuant to our non-resident motorist service statute apply to .a defendant such as appellee ?

Appellant, as administrator of the estate of Elmedia E. Kerr, filed action against the appellee in Pulaski 'Circuit Court, claiming damages for the death of the deceased. The complaint alleged that the deceased was driving her automobile on a public highway when the appellee negligently drove another car into and against her car, inflicting injuries which…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Wuchter v. PizzuttiSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Oviatt, Administrator v. GarretsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  4. Flynn v. KramerMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Rose v. GisiNebraska Supreme Court · 1941

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lucas Hunt Village Co. v. KleinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  2. Halliman v. StilesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  3. Marsh v. SpradlingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  4. State v. StarksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  5. Fritchey v. SummarDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1949

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API