Legal Opinion

Sanders v. Walsh

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 16, 2013No. G047440PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

IKOLA, J.

Plaintiff Cheryl Sanders sued defendants Constance Walsh and Wiggin Out Salons, Inc. (Wiggin Out), over allegedly defamatory statements posted online. After a bench trial, the court entered judgment for plaintiff, awarding compensatory and punitive damages. Defendants raise five contentions on appeal: (1) The defamatory statements were nonactionable opinion; (2) the court erred in finding they were collaterally estopped from relitigating issues previously decided in a small claims action; (3) the court erred in excluding evidence of plaintiff’s prior felony conviction, which…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Vandenberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. ComputerXpress, Inc. v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. Cassim v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Wong v. JingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. Sanderson v. NiemannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. (PS) James v. Metzger Mgt. Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2025
  2. Avenmarg v. Humboldt CountyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
  3. Chen v. Sutherland CA6California Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Edalati v. Kaiser Found. Health Plan CA1/5California Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. James Alger v. Ashford CM Partners LP et al.District Court, C.D. California · 2026

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API