Sanders v. Walsh
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
IKOLA, J.
Plaintiff Cheryl Sanders sued defendants Constance Walsh and Wiggin Out Salons, Inc. (Wiggin Out), over allegedly defamatory statements posted online. After a bench trial, the court entered judgment for plaintiff, awarding compensatory and punitive damages. Defendants raise five contentions on appeal: (1) The defamatory statements were nonactionable opinion; (2) the court erred in finding they were collaterally estopped from relitigating issues previously decided in a small claims action; (3) the court erred in excluding evidence of plaintiff’s prior felony conviction, which…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Vandenberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- ComputerXpress, Inc. v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Cassim v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Wong v. JingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Sanderson v. NiemannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- (PS) James v. Metzger Mgt. Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Avenmarg v. Humboldt CountyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
- Chen v. Sutherland CA6California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Edalati v. Kaiser Found. Health Plan CA1/5California Court of Appeal · 2016
- James Alger v. Ashford CM Partners LP et al.District Court, C.D. California · 2026
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.