Legal Opinion
(PS) James v. Metzger Mgt. Co.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 6, 2025No. 2:23-cv-01174Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY ALEXANDER JAMES, No. 2:23-cv-1174-DAD-SCR 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 MATZGER MANAGEMENT COMPANY, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 Plaintiff Anthony Alexander James is proceeding pro se in this action, which was referred 19 to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending 20 before the undersigned is Defendant Matzger Management Company’s motion to dismiss the 21 First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) (ECF No. 14). For the reasons stated…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.