Legal Opinion

Ainsworth v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1988No. S004517PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

We review the unanimous recommendation of the Review Department of the State Bar Court that petitioner be disbarred. The review department adopted the findings and conclusions of the hearing panel. We accept these findings as our own and agree disbarment should be imposed.

I. Findings of Fact

Petitioner was admitted to practice in 1974. The proceedings below concerned eight specific instances of misconduct between 1979 and 1984.

The disciplinary proceeding consisted of two consolidated cases. In two notices to show cause, filed in February 1985 and January 1986, petitioner was…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Yokozeki v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Saleeby v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Jackson v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. In Re Jerald C.California Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Maltaman v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re EisenhauerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  2. Arthur Andersen LLP v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Fisher v. Allis-Chalmers Corp. Product Liability TrustCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. Lebbos v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Sugarman v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API