Legal Opinion
Dyonyx, L.P. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 15, 2008No. 08-458CPublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MILLER, Judge.
This bid protest is before the court after argument on cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record. The Government originally made the senseless jurisdictional argument that an agency arbitrarily can declare a protested proposal to be nonconforming, while accepting the awardee’s allegedly nonconforming proposal, and thereby preclude the protestor from standing to challenge the award. During argument defendant agreed that a protestor can challenge an agency determination that its proposal was noncompliant and that the awardee’s was compliant.
*461FACTS
The…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Scanwell Laboratories, Inc. v. John H. Shaffer, Administrator (Acting) of the Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Linc Government Services, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Magnum Opus Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Allied Technology Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Mil-Mar Century Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Carahsoft Technology Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.