Legal Opinion
Mil-Mar Century Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 12, 2013No. 13-131CPublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Posb-Award Bid Protest; Claims by Incumbent Contractor of Improper Technical Evaluation of Proposals, Unequal Discussions, Improper Price Realism Analysis, and Flawed Best Value Analysis
OPINION
HEWITT, Chief Judge
This is a post-award bid protest brought by plaintiff Mil-Mar Century Corp. (Mil-Mar or plaintiff), the incumbent contractor responsible for designing and manufacturing Load Handling System Compatible Water Tank-Rack Systems (known as Hippos). See Compl. for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief (Complaint or Compl), Docket Number (Dkt. No.) 1, ¶¶2, 14-17. Plaintiff protests the award by…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Bcpeabody Construction Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- St Net, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- American Auto Logistics, Lp v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- UnitedHealth Military & Veterans Services, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Am General, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.